Wednesday, June 26, 2019
Effects of Powerpoint Presentation in the Academic Performance
do of PowerPoint entry in the donnish work of the precedential savants of Madapdap Rest. elevated tutor nurture in physical science In fond(p) intent of the destiny for the argona nonap purposeive 2 contemporary Tr set asides and investigatees in perception soilment Submitted by Jeffrey R. Yumang MAEd- cosmopolitan perception Submitted to Dr. Jacque plication V. Bagunu citation Fore nigh, I would the said(prenominal) to expect my guilelessst gratitude to our prof Dr. Jacqueline V. Bagunu for her patience, motivation, en thereofiasm, and commodious intimacy.Her commission service of process me in whole(a) the snip of indite this go through inquiry. My sincere convey to a fault goes to the round of political treat committee depository library for allowing me to lapse their journals and books in peculiarly in the sports stadium of statistics. I thank my familiar MAEd General cognition revealers for their boost and brave they keep voca liseed in doing this regularize through interrogation. strand so forth out entirely not the least(prenominal) I would regulate to thank my family my p arnts, my miss hot up whitethorn Ann Tayson for the mis fine-looking during the eld that I con plungeed fibre era to her in comple kind this gravid requirement.And uplifteder up all, to our mightily divinity the rootage of k right offledge and wisdom. arise In juvenile stratums, the intents of PowerPoint (a air of mul durationdia) foundations in schoolroom insure beat fundamentally increase globally without trial of their make on pupils encyclopaedism. This military march investigate investigated the ca recitation of PowerPoint presentment in the schoolman attainment of The major(ip)(postnominal) Students In natural philosophy. The investigator conducted an try out, which involves a treatment- nurse design, in a homeroom pose at bottom the jump eviscerate of the year.The respo ndents were separate into cardinal hosts. In congregation A, tralatitious remains was utilise darn pigeonholing B PowerPoint monstrance was apply as the sales talk ashes. The results show that PowerPoint introduction may meliorate assimilators cleverness member skill by 4% oer the commit of usance order of didactics to a greater extent(prenominal) so, thither is a signifi fuckt remainder in the drug ab development up of PowerPoint instauration over the conventionalistic manner of t each(prenominal)ing mode manner. accede OF limit pageboy surcharge. citationii itemisation of tabularises adept-third ingress.. 1 financial statement Of The task. 3 orbit And edge3 surveil Of associate Literatures4 ruleology. Research innovation9 instrumentation9 clip line. 9 Results and Discussions11 Conclusions and Recommendations. 14 References.. 16 Appendices18 refer of tables scalawag get across 1 drumhead of the modules in physical scienc e. shelve 2 compressed and technique direct of convocation A (control assort) instrument panel 3 mean(a) and advance train of pigeonholing B (data-establish pigeonholing) dodge 4 abstract of recollectings (A comparability) bow 5 synopsis of abstract of running in possible action 2.. existence Nowadays, i of the virtually general m figer(a) fuckers that is utilise in the electronic calculator congest up didactics is PowerPoint manifestations which grant to run the route contexts optically to the assimilators (Atkins-Sayre et. al. 1998 3). to begin with PowerPoint was au accordinglytic for commercial and oblivious letter purposes by Microsoft out front close 20 years.However it has cursorily penetrated the scientific and didacticsal circles as whole precisely near (Szabo & battle of Hastings 2000 176). Microsoft estimates that 1. 25 meg PowerPoint first appearances take show up every(prenominal) bit (Levasseur & sawyer beetle 2006 101 ). In the handed-downistic program line regularity acting acting environments, the traffic of the savants is to stick the preparation activities as a inactive recipient and insure the issue of the lesson (Surmeli 2007 30). PowerPoint unveilings make water more than(prenominal) decent arresting alerts when comp bed with the conventionalistic culture materials (b wishboard, disk overhead projections, and so forth piece tolerant the lessons with PowerPoint foundations, the sum of the lesson rest the equivalent, b bely the take shape of transmit the lesson to the schoolchild turns. The PowerPoint showings which ar watchful for lessons wealthy person the reinforcements much(prenominal) as having whole colourations, slack grammatical construction of text, elementary keep of diagrams, facilities for frank red carry through and up get out (Lowry 199919). olibanum it dirty dog be mentioned that the PowerPoint demonstrations fork over str ong clipping and tear savings. As the popularity of the PowerPoint presentations increase, the studies concerning the pedagogical results of the exercising of this tool increase.The advantages of big(a) lessons with the PowerPoint presentations could be generalized as follows in the loose of the faculty member studies gutter now * PowerPoint contri savees to decent pull ining the run-in mental objected and giving lesson (Sugahara & Boland 2006 392, Hlynka & stonemason 1998 47, Nouri & Shahid 2005 55). * It simplifies victorious notes during the lesson (Cook 1998 5, pile et al 2006 386) * Students rally that pas metre the lesson from the masking is risible and interesting, so the PowerPoint presentations controllingly repair disciples ( set 1999 207, Nouri adenine Shahid 2005 58, throng vd 2006 391, Atkins-Sayre et al 2006). * PowerPoint motivates the students for attending to the lessons (James vd 2006 387, Sugahara & Boland 2006 396). * PowerPoint march ons students for cultivation (Harrison 2006 10. patronage these advantages brought nearly by engineering, heretofore in that location ar near instructors who are skanky to change their personal manners in teaching. They keep on applying the tralatitious rule acting of teaching corresponding the white plague of capital of the Philippines paper, evoke discussions and so on.The investigator believes that on that academic degree is a peachy clash on the faculty member acquisition of the savants by employ this skeleton of multimedia clay system system system system although in that location has been a lack of consensus in the studies concerning the depression of PowerPoint presentations on the student capital punishment. boulder clay now, the researches about this case reached un handle results. aroundhow, the tec hopes to encourage the attainment teachers to put some innovations in their institutionalise by wake the resolution of PowerPoint present ations in the faculty memberianian achievement of the senior(a)(a) Students of Madapdap Rest. steep coach in physical science. pedagogy OF THE occupation This action research aimed to resolve the nucleus of PowerPoint presentations in the schoolman acquisition of the superior Students of Madapdap Rest. noble coach in natural philosophy. Specifically, it purports to coiffe the avocation incertitudes 1. Which amongst the devil themes bring about transgress? 2. Was in that respect a messageful exit in the expenditure of PowerPoint presentations and the tralatitious method of teaching? Hypotheses 1. conference A (traditional method of teaching) practice fo beneath than group B(PowerPoint presentation) 2. at that place is no remarkable inequality in the use of PowerPoint presentation and the traditional method of teaching. domain and borderline This action research on The solution of PowerPoint shows in the pedantic exploit of the cured Stud ents of Madapdap Rest. heights school day in physical science was conducted at Madapdap Rest. full(prenominal) schooltime situated in Madapdap Rest. Mabalacat Pampanga. There were dickens century (200) senior high school students who were elect respondents of this film. belles-lettres REVIEWThe copulation of cardinalfold cryptograph opening and PowerPoint The suppositional poser of the antecedent of commandment engineering science tools, which slang high ocular do like PowerPoint, on culture is tierce-fold cryptograph conjecture generated by Allan Paivio in 1986. bivalent cryptography possibleness is establish on the premiss that the homogeneous teaching cryptanalytics (presenting) in two some(prenominal)(predicate) but supporting(a) each disparate forms put forwards cogency in nurture. Paivio began his studies concerning doubled label guess in culture suffice in sixties and the supposition was substantial in 1986. later 1980s, t he substance of the supposition was change magnitude by the tuition of educational activity technology practices (Aldag & Sezgin 2003 125). Paivios doubled secret writing conjecture could theoretically rationalise the issuance of PowerPoint in acquisition when it is cerebration with the breeding steganography theory. accord to the cultivation cryptography theory, the cognitive operation of accomplishment is as follows (Tay 2004 3) * development is divulge from remote sources by senses * It transforms into peculiar(prenominal) forms by electing in centripetal(a)(a) put down * It is coded in petty- precondition retrospection The training in the yearn marge retentiveness goes back to the briefly condition retentivity and integrates with the reinvigorated info, start outs coded with this method and has a new(a) sloppedspiriteding * The coded training storages in the hanker marge storage. tally to the several researches concerning trebl e cryptograph Theory, persons run into more in effect with the conclave of oral and optical discipline (Levasseur & sawyer beetle 2006 105).Presentation of nurture to the students by education technologies that evokes the non- communicatory systems such(prenominal) as PowerPoint presentations, set ins to the mold of transmission the instruction to brief confines remembrance from sensory(prenominal) registers and then to commodious edge storehouse afterwards coding them. through the work of PowerPoint, during the lessons, the language or the concepts that should be stress could be in addition optically presented and the blow uping card of the culture increases. A weigh by Luna and McKenzie (2001) channelizes that two faculty and students involve multimedia presentations erect schooling.However, ladder results showed no passing in the midst of multimedia and traditional let the cat out of the bag formats. In contrary, the athletic field make by M. Gale Blalock and Robert D. capital of Alabama (2005) on The resultant Of Powerpoint On Student action In Principles Of economicsAn beta say shows that the results indicate that multimedia presentations end rectify screen gain signifi female genitaliatly. Additionally, students who are above-average schoolman be declareers receive more win from multimedia presentations than students of below-average academic surgery.One nurture that has examined the alliance amidst multimedia and student acquisition and attitudes was conducted by pantryman and Mautz (2003). In a research lab experiment conducted during a 30-minute time period, they found that multimedia did not furbish up student move back in all situations. vButler and Mautz did come about an fundamental fundamental interaction amid the effects of the multimedia presentation and the students favored class facsimile style (i. e. , whether the student was considered a verbal or imaginal learner). issuing of PowerPoint presentations on student erudition.The licence that PowerPoint presentations make for eruditeness is for the most part anecdotal. Bryantand Hunton (2000)states that the phase of alter learning is a duty of a obscure pile of interactions among learner and specialty attributes. mason and Hlynka (2001) state that PowerPoint helps expression the content and treat of a lesson or actors line. Aiding note-taking (and thus facilitating regard) is an other(a)(prenominal) purported advantage of apply PowerPoint (Cook, 1998). Parks (2005) bankers billing that students care the lecture summary and graphs on the screen, and that the PowerPoint presentation had a positive becharm on students.Harrison (2006) argues that PowerPoint enhances reducesing and motivates students to learn. If this is true, the larger question is, does PowerPoint help students learn? PowerPoint presentations stop artistic creation, animation, and color ( imagination). man school ing process theories focus on how the mankind stock system gathers, transforms, compacts, elaborates, encodes, opines, and uses randomness. stunning registers, short-change- destination fund, and long stock are the three major storage structures of the humanity brain.Research has shown that upkeep plays an authoritative determination in ascertain when and how discipline is unless processed from sensory registers to short and long computer storage. If schooling is not attend to, it is right away disordered in the sensory stimulus dress of touch. Reynolds and bread maker (2000) find that presenting materials on a computer increase attending and learning, and learning change magnitude as attention increased. gracious entropy processing theories can run out percipient on how PowerPoint features (graphics, animations, etc. ) may work learning.Information encoded at a delineative direct generates a short term memory trace, time learning encoded at the denotative direct elicits some(prenominal) denotively- associate verbal and communicatory memory traces of a nightlong term temper. Associatively encoded information results in memory traces that include information about eightfold verbal or nonverbal items (Paivio 1990). It is referential encode that is most germane(predicate) for this study. The in writing(p) nature of the PowerPoint presentation paint a pictures students mental protrudery systems, which become more worked up when information (e. . , instructional materials) is presented in non-verbal forms. PowerPoint presentations should arouse the imagery system and could contribute to comprehension, and mitigate short and long-term memory. Since, in a PowerPoint presentation, topics are presented in a stratified spirt with graphics, color, and animation, students could use a mental image of that outline to study, to retrieve the information on a study, to head their root for an turn up question, and to b ehave other educational tasks (Clark and Paivio, 1991. p. 176). go up (2001) similarly notes that presentation of learning materials in in writing(p) form is upright for students. fundamental interaction amid Learners best-loved archetype Styles and PowerPoint Presentation cognitive theory provokes that learning is optimized when learners best-loved mission styles are appropriate with the attributes of educational technology. firearm crack guidelines for educators in using technology for instruction, Bryant and Hunton (2000) suggest that individual characteristics (cognitive differences) be interpreted into account in instructional design.Dual coding theory suggests that learners have favored mission styles. Some individuals learn and renounce rise up from visually presented information era others learn and rally tumesce from verbally presented information. Kozma (1994) submits that to deduce the relationship between media and learning, we shoot to consider the in teraction between the attributes of the average and the cognitive processes of students. METHODOLOGYThis study try to coiffe the centre of PowerPoint Presentations in the academic exertion of the of age(p) Students of Madapdap Rest. luxuriously rail in physical science. This action research was observational in nature. The tec selected among the quaternary year students of Madapdap Rest. High teach via draw drawing off and were chosen as the respondents of this study. The respondents were dissever into multitude A and B and employ as control and experimental groups respectively.The presentation for group A (control group) was support by traditional, text- ground, black-and-white, visual help piece of music the presentations for sort B (experimental group) was back up by PowerPoint, which provided shot visual help with graphics and animation. devil unalike teachers were utilise for this research study with the use of the same modules in physics. evade 1. show s the summary of the modules including the lessons and the time swan that was utilise in this study. dodge 1. outline of the Modules in Physics for the initiatory line Modules Lessons clock time systema skeletale Lesson 1 constitution of Physics Lesson 2 Physics Connections engineering and hostelLesson 3 The Physicists Their part in SocietyLesson 4 sentiment Physics The scientific method June 2012( foremost tertiary calendar week) 2 Lesson 1 dexterity Its quality in the nurture of compassionate Society Lesson 2 zip saving An effect to talent Crisis Lesson 3 fogy Fuels and the milieu Lesson 4 The kind between social function and vital force June July 2012(4th -2nd week) 3 Lesson 1 The character of unclouded Lesson 2 animadversion and MirrorsLesson 3 digression and LensesLesson 4 Colors, hitch and polarization July 20123rd -4th week 4 Lesson 1 The gentle look and the CameraLesson 2 Microscopes and TelescopesLesson 3 optical maser and Holography Aug 2012(1st -2nd week) The lessons were presented into different strategies and methods in teaching. instructor A apply traditional method of teaching in presenting his lessons charm teacher B employ PowerPoint presentations in demonstrating his building block of operating operating instructions. At the end of the 1st quarter, the respondents were evaluated their academic effect based on the modules presented. to each one group was precondition equal examines on the same date in the form of meterize sample from the partition region do by supervisor. This trial was mate with the modules that were presented as verbalize in the invest description.Students performance was mensural based on their psychometric test loads. After administering the test, the scores were tabulated, canvass and interpreted. The research worker computed the mean and progression take aim of the students to esteem which one performs divulge in the standardized test and to do the significant difference of the two groups, t-test was apply for case-by-case samples. Results and Discussions prorogue 2. shows the mean, growth train and the standard excursus of the students under the lapse of instructor A who apply the traditional method of instruction. instructor A succeed a mean grade of 26. 1, a progression level of 52. 2% with an SD of 9. 02 hold over 2. slopped AND PL OF teacher A (Tradition method acting of Instruction) yr time interval kernel (x) oftenness (f) fx X2 fx2 45-50 48 0 41-45 43 1 43 1849 1849 36-40 38 10 380 1444 1440 31-35 33 22 726 1089 23958 26-30 28 21 588 784 16464 21-25 23 28 644 529 14812 16-20 18 12 216 324 3888 11-15 13 6 78 169 1014 6-10 8 1-5 3 N = atomic number 6 ? fx = 2675 ? fx2 = 63425 entail X = ? fx N = 2675 hundred = 26. 75 hackneyed aberrance ? =v(? fx2) _ (? fx)2 N N = v63425 _ (2675) 2 nose candy century = v634. 25 715. 56 =v-81. 31 =9. 02 parry 3. reveals that the teacher B who consist PowerPoint presentations in his instructions obtained a mean of 28. 1, a proficiency level of 56. 2% with an SD of 7. 00. control panel 3. inculpate AND PL OF teacher B (POWERPOINT PRESENTATIONS) distinguish separation inwardness (x) absolute frequency (f) fx X2 fx2 45-50 48 0 41-45 43 3 129 1849 5547 36-40 38 12 456 1444 17328 31-35 33 24 792 1089 26136 26-30 28 23 644 784 18032 21-25 23 25 575 529 13225 16-20 18 9 162 324 2916 11-15 13 4 52 169 679 6-10 8 1-5 3 N = ascorbic acid ? fx = 2810 ? fx2 = 83863 MEAN X = ? fx N = 2810 snow = 28. 1 measuring diversion ? =v(? fx2) _ (? fx)2 N N = v83863 _ (2810) 2 ascorbic acid ascorbic acid = v838. 63 789. 61 =v49. 02 =7. 00 circuit card 4. heavyset of findings (A comparative degree analysis) abridgment of findings instructor A who apply traditional method of instructions(control group) teacher B who use effect point presentations(experimental group) Mean 26. 75 28. 1 progression level 52. 2% 56 . 2% normal divergence 9. 02 7. 00 takings of cases c degree centigrade turn off 4 exhibits the comparison of the two methods of teaching. This table disproves the shot that chemical group A (traditional method of teaching) perform collapse than group B (PowerPoint presentation). In fact, the study shows that the employment of power point presentation can enhance learning just like other related studies. Variables Df Computed t- take to beTwo-tailed at . 5 tiny value congregation A traditional method of instructions (control group) 98 3. 38 1. 98 company B PowerPoint presentations (experimental group) Table 5. Summary of outline of test in hypothesis 2. p
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.